Malfeasance: when elected officials break the law...

Ferguson...is just the beginning.

When you're an employee of a business, or corporation, you're expected to perform your job, in exchange for being paid properly and well.

If you fail to do your job (or duty, depending on who your employer is), you get suspended, 'written-up', or outright fired from your job.

If you disobey a law, (doing something stupid like stealing, harassing, assaulting, etc), you face and receive consequences.

And so it's the same with politicians. When elected politicians violate their oath of office, (and are negligent by refusing to uphold the law, including the US and Washington State Constitutions), they commit malfeasance.

Malfeasance, as defined by the RCWs (Revised Code of Washington), specifically 29A.56.110) is:

(1) "Misfeasance" or "malfeasance" in office means any wrongful conduct that affects, interrupts, or interferes with the performance of official duty;

(a) Additionally, "misfeasance" in office means the performance of a duty in an improper manner; and

(b) Additionally, "malfeasance" in office means the commission of an unlawful act;

(2) "Violation of the oath of office" means the neglect or knowing failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a duty imposed by law.

When someone is elected into office, they are a 'public servant'. As a requirement of being allowed to serve in that office, they must have an 'oath of office' filed with the Secretary of State, as well as have a surety bond.

ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS MUST HAVE AN OATH OF OFFICE, BEFORE BEING ALLOWED INTO OFFICE. VIOLATING THAT OATH, IS MALFEASANCE (failure of duty).

The oath of office involves upholding the US and Washington State Constitution, as well as all laws in this state. Failing to do so (via negligence), is malfeasance (also known as 'failure of duty').

RCW 42.20.100 - Failure of duty by public officer a misdemeanor.

Whenever any duty is enjoined by law upon any public officer or other person holding any public trust or employment, their wilful neglect to perform such duty, except where otherwise specially provided for, shall be a misdemeanor.

RCW 9a.80.010 - Official misconduct.

(1) A public servant is guilty of official misconduct if, with intent to obtain a benefit or to deprive another person of a lawful right or privilege:

(a) He or she intentionally commits an unauthorized act under color of law; or

(b) He or she intentionally refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him or her by law.

(2) Official misconduct is a gross misdemeanor.

The multiple ways malfeasance have been committed by Washington state politicians, are:

Sponsoring bills that are in violation of both the state AND US Constitution; refusing to uphold immigration laws; declaring the state immune to immigration laws (which could ALSO be viewed as an act of sedition, if not outright rebellion); allowing a known terrorist organization to take residence in the state, unchecked; crafting ans signing laws that prevent us from auditing our elections, vote registrations, and suppressing investigation of election fraud; allowing initiatives to be on the ballot, knowing they violate ‘one subject sentence’; crafting and sponsoring bills that criminalize free speech (in violation of the 1^st Amendment of the US Constitution, as well as the WA State Constitution); sponsoring and crafting bills that infringe on our right to bear arms; prosecuting law enforcement officers for defending themselves; declaring anyone who speaks out against election fraud an 'election threat'(even though it's speech protected under the 1^st amendment (and the WA State Constitution); ignoring iniitatives signed into law by 'We the People', while encouraging lawlessness by other elected officials; refusing to secure our elections; refusing to enforce the law the politicians swore an oath to uphold.

The list goes on.

A statutory judgement, ruling that someone in a position of power has acted 'unlawfully', is malfeasance.

RCW 9.92.120 - Conviction of public officer forfeits trust.

The conviction of a public officer of any felony or malfeasance in office shall entail, in addition to such other penalty as may be imposed, the forfeiture of his or her office, and shall disqualify him or her from ever afterward holding any public office in this state.

In simple terms, someone who’s been convicted of malfeasance, must not only be removed from office, but banned from holding office, ever again!! This means the moment someone has a judgement against them, or commits an act of malfeasance (by violating their oath of office), cannot be on any ballot, for ANY election in Washington State (or possibly federal)….EVER. A ruling denying injunction relief, doesn’t count, as it doesn’t reverse a statutory judgement.

Violation of that oath, is grounds for a recall, or impeachment, via quo warranto (which is a legal action, demanding the person who's the subject of this action, show they are justified/qualified/have the right to their their position of office/authority.).

A recall election is more dicey, as it involves fees of 1000s of dollars ('We the People' have to pay for the right to recall an official who's violated their oath of office...whose position is paid for by OUR taxpayer dollars).

The other problem with recall elections, is they are time-consuming, and are subject to the whims of the courts that make these rulings...and often NOT in favor of 'We the People'. (the Recall Inslee initiative is a prime example; it’s been stuck in ‘development hell’ for well over three years, due to lack of funding).Even after the courts make a favorable ruling in our favor, we STILL have to deal with the rigged elections. And make no mistake, they WILL rig the elections in favor of any politician (remember what happened with Newsome….TWICE).

The second option, is impeachment. This involves petitioning the State House of Representatives, and having them contact the Lieutenant Governor (it would normally be the governor, but in this case, he’s unable, due to a legal disability…being implicitly named as a co-defendant. Normally, an impeachment inquiry would be done during the normal legislative session; but due to this time period being ‘out of session’, the lieutenant governor would be the one to iniitate the proceedings) to do an impeachment inquiry. Most elected offices where the person is elected, or appointed as a public servant, can face impeachment (under article V, of the Washington State Constitution).

We have a situation where something of this nature, can take down the entire Olympia Regime, simply because they have chosen to violate their oaths of office…malfeasance. This will further underscore this argument, once Steve Hobbs (the corrupt Secretary of State), certfies the results from the August 2024 primary.

Ferguson is not eligible to be on the ballot, or in the governor’s race. In fact, neither are any of the politicians who failed to uphold the law in our state, who are seeking re-election.

There is one other option that I’m becoming very privy to, and that’s the ‘lawful notice’.

It involves understanding a little bit about common law, affadavits, and how to effectively use them. This Ferguson malfeasance has the potential to take down the vast majority of the Olympia Regime…for they have committed many acts of malfeasance, as detailed above.

Stay frosty, patriots. More information is on the way, and it’ll be posted as it’s received and formed into something easily understood.